Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Necessary" category. The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Analytics" category. Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category.
These cookies do not store any personal information. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Probably as a result of owning a saab as my first car but that's a tale for a different day.Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Just my two cents.or 1.14 eurocents.I'd rather own a simple product made with solid parts than a fancy one made with flimsy parts. My great grandmother's pasta machine still works just fine too, despite years and years of use. While my little Bialetti, simple and ugly.scorched from years of use, still puts out a fine brew.
Only to see them break after the first year or two of use. I can't count the number of fancy espresso/cappuccino machines my friends have bought.laden with plastic parts and unnecessary features. You are right about a simple and old tool still getting the job done though. ( I believe you drive a Ford if my memory serves me right) Carbon (I'm not against change and improvements), but I'd like to see change incorporated into a product that's built ford tough. Anyway, I agree that the new technology is nice and certainly respect the advances that it offers, I'm just not that impressed with the feel of the omer. Hey Spaghetti, had to laugh when I saw your post because I normally just see you on deeperblue. Sure you may love your old gun so much to stick with it forever until it does kill fish, and that's fine: I myself have shot hundreds of skinny european fish with the Viper/Predator handle, and sticked to it for years until it fell apart.īut a technologically advanced functional design is still a technologically advanced functional desing: something to consider, or at least to regard with respect. This said, you may still have a perfect feeling and do a better job using an older, relatively primitive tool, if you feel good with it. Talking of functional design: it's a tool that's technologically engineered to give us a "plus" when compared to older designs. I'm not talking 'bout how cool the Cayman may look. The feel is very subjective, but the Cayman handle has objectively a more advanced functional design (ergonomics et cetera) than the Predator handle, which is really good but almost 20 years old (Predator's handle is a rebranding of Dessault's Viper handle from the early 90's). But considering the number of Mako users on this board, I don't think it has been a serious problem for a majority of the users. I have heard about the jamming issue and there is a post up with a simple solution for it. The open or closed muzzle from mako can use bulk rubber (cheap) whereas the omer requires screw in omer bands ($$$$$). The handle was firm and comfortable, the spear is a RA spear and is very tough (the omer spear is too thin and flimsy), and the gun fired well. I was more impressed with the Mako predator pro. I do however know of several people who love this handle because it places your hand very high up and makes aiming very natural. I also hated the safety which was a tiny little lever that was impossible to switch on or off while wearing gloves (but I know not many people use the safety anyway). I also didn't like the feel of the handle as it seemed too small for my hands (and I don't have big hands). I used the Cayman HF a while back, which I believe uses the same handle, and was very unimpressed with the gun.
0 kommentar(er)
